Various thoughts from an educational professional & geek.
Looking for aliens? Try searching the cloud ... from @ConversationUK with @yijun_yu
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
By Andrew Smith, The Open University and Yijun Yu, The Open University
As a species, human beings are obsessed with the idea that there may be aliens out there, somewhere beyond our planet.
This obsession really took off in the late 19th century, when suggestions that there might be canals on Mars and popular books such as War of the Worlds by HG Wells did little to quell excitement over the chance that we might be sharing our universe with others.
But despite this passion for all things extra-terrestrial, we haven’t come up with much. Maybe we’re doing it wrong. It might be time for us to start revisiting old data with new techniques.
Canals on Mars?
Will ET phone us, or phone home?
As radio technology and radio astronomy developed, we soon discovered that there are plenty of interesting noises and signals coming from space. These are caused by our Sun and other astronomical objects, such as Pulsars. That prompted us to start listening out for noises that could be something else.
The thinking behind this is that we humans are constantly leaking radio waves out into space and we have been doing so sicne 1897. Every time we make a radio broadcast or have a conversation on our mobile phone or even via an old fashioned walkie-talkie, we send something else out there. Everything we have ever sent wirelessly is travelling around somewhere beyond this planet. If there was an alien passing by, one can only wonder what they may think of us.
And in the hope that the same might be true in reverse, the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI), has been working for more than 50 years to investigate whether any other intelligent life forms are trying to contact us by looking at what comes our way.
SETI’s view is that an intelligent species would, if they were trying, send us a clear signal that was easy to interpret. It would probably be something mathematical such as a series of prime numbers.
So radio telescopes are always pointing spacewards, capturing all radio signals. That’s where we could find communications, among all the galactic back ground noise.
Since 1999, SETI@home, which is part of the University of California, has been getting volunteers to donate some of their spare computer time to help the search. This comes in the form of a screensaver, which activates when you have left your computer unattended. After all, your expensive, very powerful computer processor is now sitting there doing very little in computational terms.
This has proved to be a considerable hit, with enthusiasts all over the world donating their computing power. It works thanks to a simple yet clever form of distributed computing. SETI servers give your computer a small amount of data to process and your machine sends it back for analysis once it is finished. Multiple computers can work on a large data set, reducing analysis time as well as the considerable cost that would come with using an array of computers the size of a Google Cluster to solve the problem.
Despite its popularity, people are starting to wonder how it is that nearly half a century has passed without so much as a peep out of our alien neighbours. Some think the current approach is not quite the right way to go about making intergalactic friends after all.
We could look at how to update the SETI approach using new technology and methods if we want to up our alien-hunting game.
The programme could be more successful and meaningful, for example, if greater weight was given to the radio signals coming from the direction of ExoPlanets and ExoMoons in the Goldilocks zones.
And given that SETI data has been accumulated over 40 years, it might now be time to revisit some of it, taking a different approach. Cloud computing or something like what Google Streetcar time travel view does now would make it easier to distribute such recalculations globally again. So you could select one astronomical location, such as a star cluster and compare the data collected over different time periods against the other regions of space.
Processing this amount of data would have been near impossible in SETI’s early days but is now a relatively standard operation. People all over the world have shown that they are ready to pitch in their computing power to look for aliens, so this might be the perfect time to empower them even more.
With all this new technology though, we might once again need to start thinking about whether our alien neighbours actually want to be contacted or if they would just prefer to be left alone.
Yijun Yu receives funding from ERC, EU, QNRF. He is affiliated with IEEE and British Computing Society. Andrew Smith does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.
This article was originally published on The Conversation.
Read the original article.
Ok, this is not a scientific study, the audience participation is likely to be from a self selecting group etc. So lets call this a poll amongst friends, followers and like minded. A question that is structural to my research is ... Do you think simulation can replace real hardware, when teaching networking? To remain fair, I am not going to share my opinion as it is biased and please don't try and answer this to please me (as I really don't know who will be answering and if you know me, you will know that it won't). Please take a look at the top left of this blog and based on your personal opinion, answer either yes or no. You do not have to be an expert, or an academic or even a teccie, everyone's opinion in this context counts. The opinions below are valid view points, but must not contribute to your own independent decision, please complete the question before reading these. =================================...
Ok, for many who read my blog, you may be aware that I dabble with many geeky projects, some count as work. As a fan of the shiny world of Mac, I have produced a couple of creative commons resources over the years for the Cisco Academy community, covering how Packet Tracer may be ported to a Mac. Looks like we now have a potentially tidy version three offering, moving from Virtual Machine, to Play on Mac now to a fully 'bottled' app, I have this working on v 5.3.3 and v6.0 (beta) To download please follow this link and download the app for 5.3.3, it looks like it will work on .... Snow Leopard, Lion and Mountain Lion, but this I would like to see tested. Multiuser seems to work, but you MUST set a rule in your firewall to allow this, otherwise your Mac will ignore any connection attempts. Yes you will need to unzip the contents of the folder to a location that you wish to run this, I may work on a DMG file, but lets do one step at a time. Please also note, it is 2...
Last night I deliberately started a debate on a ‘teachers of programming’ forum to gauge response. As expected those who were ‘interested’ in sticking to their ideas responded. I asked the question … I am of the view that Pascal is best kept in the past, where anyone who says that they are still teaching current programming skills using this language, worries me. Am I being unreasonable? The response was defensive and encouraged those who feel that it is something they must teach to self-acknowledge this fact. My concerns regarding Pascal stem from many positions: Old technology, being taught now …. If this were current in any way I would have less of an issue. It concerns me that some still teach C, but its structure is such that it does help programmers learn something that many systems use. But Pascal’s verbose structure is from a time gone, so why? Is it being used in anger? There is a place for scratch and greenfoot in getting stude...
Comments
Post a Comment