Passed the ethics committee
... was helped by the fact that I was clear on not wanting any personal information.
With access to three substantial populations of Cisco students, studying between May and October. I intend to ask a very short sequence of questions, twice.
There will be no change to the questions, except for two of the populations there will be experience of 'simulation' and one will have less exposure (by nature of their study design).
Asking each population at the same time, but twice, will garner a before and after experience view. Whilst there is scope for confounding information even at this level, with potentially self selecting groups, we hope to encourage participation from a cross section of students.
Now the approval is there, a few careful tweaks must take place, within the parameters of the approval.
With access to three substantial populations of Cisco students, studying between May and October. I intend to ask a very short sequence of questions, twice.
There will be no change to the questions, except for two of the populations there will be experience of 'simulation' and one will have less exposure (by nature of their study design).
Asking each population at the same time, but twice, will garner a before and after experience view. Whilst there is scope for confounding information even at this level, with potentially self selecting groups, we hope to encourage participation from a cross section of students.
Now the approval is there, a few careful tweaks must take place, within the parameters of the approval.
Comments
Post a Comment