Various thoughts from an educational professional & geek.
Experts use internet routers to protect web from Angler malware's lures ...
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Delays from The Conversation meant that this article took ages to be published - not good really.
It may not be a household name like Microsoft, Apple or Sony, but Cisco Systems is almost the same size. Cisco is the world’s largest supplier of networking equipment such as routers and switches which plug together the various networks that make up the internet. This puts them in the position of being able to use the enormous distribution of their equipment to disable a major ongoing malware attack, Angler.
The Angler exploit kit is software used by hackers to breach and take control of computer systems, known as a tool kit. There have been many such kits over the years, for example in the 1990s the notorious Back Orifice (a pun on Microsoft Backoffice) offered hackers easy to use tools to remotely control Windows computers. Angler is one of the most advanced and widespread today.
Creating a tool kit and distributing it freely on the internet provides expert tools to wannabe hackers – known as “script kiddies” – who don’t necessarily have the skills themselves nor the opportunity to access systems to practice and hone their own hacking techniques. Angler is such a kit, used to create back doors by taking advantage in flaws in popular browser plug-ins such as Flash and Java. Remote access and control of a PC gives hackers the opportunity to take the computers hostage and demand ransom money from their victims, or to steal personal data to be used for fraud or sale.
The security experts investigating Angler estimated that it targeted around 90,000 computers a day, with an estimated fraudulent income of US$30m. As tool kits can be updated, their creators can usually provide work-arounds for each defence created by security software companies, which makes preventing the attacks difficult. While security firms are excellent at spotting variants and updating their database definitions to ensure antivirus software recognises them, not everyone updates in time (or at all) and there is always a new attack being developed.
Cisco’s intervention
Cisco helped solve this problem, together with major internet service provider Level 3 Communications, by collecting and analysing Angler’s network traffic to discover where it was headed and to tackle the problem at its source. The researchers discovered that the code that compromised targeted computers was located on an exploit server, to which the tool kit installed on compromised computers communicated via a network of proxy servers designed to hide and protect it.
Angler tool kit connects to exploit server via many proxies to hide its route.TalosIntel
By tracing where Angler’s traffic was headed, Cisco and the researchers were able to release updates for its network equipment in use worldwide that would block Angler’s attempts to communicate with its servers. The team also contacted the hosting companies with what they’d learned, which then shut down the rogue servers. Cisco has done an outstanding job, as this will make it difficult to use Angler in its current form. However it’s unlikely this will be the last we hear it – Angler’s creators and maintainers will have to work hard to adapt it to work around the blocks installed on millions of routers worldwide, but will inevitably do just that. The game of cat and mouse will continue.
Of course, however much security companies or police and investigators work to try to combat malware and hacking attacks, it’s up to you to make sure your antivirus software is installed and up-to-date. If your computer is ever held to ransom, don’t provide any financial information – it’s better to wipe your computer and start again than to hand your financial details to unknown criminals to be exploited. And of course having back-ups of essential data, such as on cloud services, means it’s easier to recover in a worst-case scenario.
Ok, this is not a scientific study, the audience participation is likely to be from a self selecting group etc. So lets call this a poll amongst friends, followers and like minded. A question that is structural to my research is ... Do you think simulation can replace real hardware, when teaching networking? To remain fair, I am not going to share my opinion as it is biased and please don't try and answer this to please me (as I really don't know who will be answering and if you know me, you will know that it won't). Please take a look at the top left of this blog and based on your personal opinion, answer either yes or no. You do not have to be an expert, or an academic or even a teccie, everyone's opinion in this context counts. The opinions below are valid view points, but must not contribute to your own independent decision, please complete the question before reading these. =================================...
Ok, for many who read my blog, you may be aware that I dabble with many geeky projects, some count as work. As a fan of the shiny world of Mac, I have produced a couple of creative commons resources over the years for the Cisco Academy community, covering how Packet Tracer may be ported to a Mac. Looks like we now have a potentially tidy version three offering, moving from Virtual Machine, to Play on Mac now to a fully 'bottled' app, I have this working on v 5.3.3 and v6.0 (beta) To download please follow this link and download the app for 5.3.3, it looks like it will work on .... Snow Leopard, Lion and Mountain Lion, but this I would like to see tested. Multiuser seems to work, but you MUST set a rule in your firewall to allow this, otherwise your Mac will ignore any connection attempts. Yes you will need to unzip the contents of the folder to a location that you wish to run this, I may work on a DMG file, but lets do one step at a time. Please also note, it is 2...
Last night I deliberately started a debate on a ‘teachers of programming’ forum to gauge response. As expected those who were ‘interested’ in sticking to their ideas responded. I asked the question … I am of the view that Pascal is best kept in the past, where anyone who says that they are still teaching current programming skills using this language, worries me. Am I being unreasonable? The response was defensive and encouraged those who feel that it is something they must teach to self-acknowledge this fact. My concerns regarding Pascal stem from many positions: Old technology, being taught now …. If this were current in any way I would have less of an issue. It concerns me that some still teach C, but its structure is such that it does help programmers learn something that many systems use. But Pascal’s verbose structure is from a time gone, so why? Is it being used in anger? There is a place for scratch and greenfoot in getting stude...
Comments
Post a Comment