Twitter chief executive Dick Costolo recently admitted in a leaked memo to staff how serious a problem online abuse and trolling on Twitter was, one that the social network has so far failed to tackle.
Certainly the problem of online abuse has been exacerbated by the ease and anonymity of the internet and social networks. But it is not exactly new. Each new communication invention has always brought with it the possibility of carrying cruel as well as kind communiqués – even at this time of year, when tradition dictates the sending of amorous cards for Valentine’s Day.
Over 150 years ago, as literacy rates improved and a universal postal service arrived in many industrialised nations, letter writing and the sending of greetings cards flourished. But with post boxes appearing on street corners it took no great leap of thought to realise it was possible to send an unkind sentiment through the post without the intervening messenger, postal service, nor the recipient knowing who sent it.
The trend continued right up until the 1940s.
And so was born the Vinegar Valentine, the sharper side of an otherwise romantic tradition. Instead of sending a loved one a romantic gesture, people would instead send a vindictive card intended to upset an enemy, colleague, neighbour or friend.
Companies saw the commercial opportunity and caught onto the trend with their own versions. Rather than creating a romantic rhyme there were comically creative with cruel verse, for women and men alike. Cartoonists, greeting card companies and copywriters found an income from this unpleasant predilection.
Vinegar Valentines didn’t exactly hold back.
Before the penny post was introduced, it was the recipient that paid for the letter sent to them. This meant that in a doubly cruel twist, the victims of vinegar Valentines would endure both insult and financial injury. While anecdotal and difficult to prove, there were reports of hapless souls subject to a deluge of these vinegar Valentines and having to bear the financial cost of their ignominy.
It would appear that vinegar Valentines lasted for some considerable time, finally losing their appeal by the 1940’s – an unsavoury 100 years or more of trolling by post.
Two centuries of trolling
Leaping forward to the present day, technology advances but alas it would seem that human nature does not, as the bosses of Twitter, Facebook, Ask.fm and many other online services have discovered.
There have been many incidents of online abuse on Twitter to gain considerable publicity, with many cases in which celebrities as well as those less known have been the subject of trolling campaigns that have eventually forced them off the site.
Better than its postal counterpart, Twitter is free to anyone with internet access, via computer or smartphone. While there are ways to track down and sanction the less techno-savvy trolls, it’s simple to set up an anonymous account, build a following, and make the lives of others a misery.
In addition, with many free Twitter automation services available it’s possible to become utterly unrelenting by bombarding individuals round the clock. Twitter set clear rules for automation, but these are not difficult to abuse if you are inclined.
Where historical vinegar Valentines required a little preparation and were not immediate, today internet trolls using twitter can react to tweets in real time, causing their victims considerable distress.
Unlike with Facebook, by default and by design Twitter is public. While you can protect your tweets, hiding in what is really a broadcast-oriented medium is difficult. Some individuals have been successful in confronting their trolls, while other trolls have discovered that the law is against them, and find themselves at Her Majesty’s pleasure.
Sadly unless Twitter makes it easier for victims to work with police and harder for trolls to hide in anonymity, such abuse will continue. For as long as it’s free and easy to use, it’s also easy to abuse. After all:
Roses are red, violets blue, in under 140 characters I can be nasty to you #vinegarvalentine
Ok, this is not a scientific study, the audience participation is likely to be from a self selecting group etc. So lets call this a poll amongst friends, followers and like minded. A question that is structural to my research is ... Do you think simulation can replace real hardware, when teaching networking? To remain fair, I am not going to share my opinion as it is biased and please don't try and answer this to please me (as I really don't know who will be answering and if you know me, you will know that it won't). Please take a look at the top left of this blog and based on your personal opinion, answer either yes or no. You do not have to be an expert, or an academic or even a teccie, everyone's opinion in this context counts. The opinions below are valid view points, but must not contribute to your own independent decision, please complete the question before reading these. =================================...
Ok, for many who read my blog, you may be aware that I dabble with many geeky projects, some count as work. As a fan of the shiny world of Mac, I have produced a couple of creative commons resources over the years for the Cisco Academy community, covering how Packet Tracer may be ported to a Mac. Looks like we now have a potentially tidy version three offering, moving from Virtual Machine, to Play on Mac now to a fully 'bottled' app, I have this working on v 5.3.3 and v6.0 (beta) To download please follow this link and download the app for 5.3.3, it looks like it will work on .... Snow Leopard, Lion and Mountain Lion, but this I would like to see tested. Multiuser seems to work, but you MUST set a rule in your firewall to allow this, otherwise your Mac will ignore any connection attempts. Yes you will need to unzip the contents of the folder to a location that you wish to run this, I may work on a DMG file, but lets do one step at a time. Please also note, it is 2...
Last night I deliberately started a debate on a ‘teachers of programming’ forum to gauge response. As expected those who were ‘interested’ in sticking to their ideas responded. I asked the question … I am of the view that Pascal is best kept in the past, where anyone who says that they are still teaching current programming skills using this language, worries me. Am I being unreasonable? The response was defensive and encouraged those who feel that it is something they must teach to self-acknowledge this fact. My concerns regarding Pascal stem from many positions: Old technology, being taught now …. If this were current in any way I would have less of an issue. It concerns me that some still teach C, but its structure is such that it does help programmers learn something that many systems use. But Pascal’s verbose structure is from a time gone, so why? Is it being used in anger? There is a place for scratch and greenfoot in getting stude...
Comments
Post a Comment