as an aside, it has been very interesting where this article has been republished ...
Having been a child of the home computer boom of the early 1980s and then worked with computers for many years, I can’t help but sigh every time a new campaign to reduce piracy comes into effect.
It’s the same now that the UK government’s new rules on piracy are coming into force – human nature will always win.
Internet users in the UK will now be sent warning letters if they have been accessing illegal material, such as copyrighted films or music. But crucially, if they choose to carry on downloading, there is nothing the government can do about it.
But even if you aren’t worried about legal repercussions, piracy is a mug’s game.
Teen on the take
As a somewhat spotty teen, I was an avid computer enthusiast. I learnt to program many different dialects of BASIC before I was 16. But it must be said, while programming was fun, playing games was equally (if not more) entertaining. I amassed a large collection of software titles during my time owning a ZX Spectrum.
Coming from a family with very modest means, I couldn’t have every game I wanted. The solution was, for a time, tape-to-tape: copying software on the only cassette format available.
But as software providers started to understand how to stop this, more elaborate protection methods evolved. These included using programs which could run tape in blocks into the computer’s memory before sending the data back to a blank cassette.
The ZX Spectrum.Marcin Wichary, CC BY
I was aware that I was depriving the games developers of royalties but my teenage mind didn’t really consider how this might be detrimental. How many of us have not taken a copy of a DVD, Video, MP3 or software application without thinking about what it might actually mean?
Pirating goes maintstream
Unlike the 1980s, we now live in a world in which internet speeds are capable of delivering large movies in minutes.
As the internet became accessible to all in the 1990s, services such as Napster solved the dial-up dilemma and created peer-to-peer file sharing applications that would harness the distributed power of everyone’s computers together. Napster is now a legitimate service, after its founders lost a legal action in 2000.
But by this point, the proverbial internet cat was out of the bag. Other services such as Grokster, BitTorrent and Kazaa had worked out how it was done and stepped in to fill the void left by Napster.
With these services on offer and legal versions emerging all the time, our consumption of media has completely changed. Many of us won’t be able to remember the last time we bought a DVD or CD. The reality is that many of us are now consuming media online.
With just a little casual research, it’s easy to find a site that will give you the film or TV show you are looking for but each comes with risks. When I had my ZX Spectrum, all we worried about was making a copy that did not work. Now, when you dabble in piracy, you face all kinds of malware threats and risk coming across some rather unsavoury pornographic pop ups.
Will you be caught?
To issue warning notices, ISPs need to catch you downloading pirated media. This isn’t difficult. They know the sites and they can see the network traffic and know the address used by your home router. Even if you use the Tor network; deep packet inspection can reveal what you’ve downloaded at or at least provide clues about what it is.
Often it doesn’t even take detective work like this. ISPs would prefer not to rifle through your data packets but often, all they need to do is take note of when someone has been greedy and has downloaded a large quantity of media. From there, it’s easy to tell the difference between Netflix and a torrent site.
And with so many free or low-cost services available, I would argue that piracy just isn’t worth the risk of the malware and scams you could come across.
Unlike my teenage self, I now appreciate the effort behind the artistic endeavours of many of these movies and MP3s that are then pirated. As their respective industries feel the loss of revenue endured by piracy, they will apply legal pressure, forcing ISPs and website providers to take control of the content they make available.
That said, unless there is total control of the internet – something I strongly oppose – people will always pirate.
Even if the letters being sent out to infringers in the UK did lead to actual legal action, the piracy problem would not be solved. Many have the basic technical skills needed to continue to access content. But they should consider that there are other dangers involved.
Andrew Smith does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.
This article was originally published on The Conversation.
Read the original article.
Yijun Yu , The Open University and Andrew Smith , The Open University In-flight Wi-Fi is one of the most sought-after facilities for air travellers these days, now that laptops and smartphones are so common and so much of our working and personal life revolves around online services. But a US Government Accountability Office report has suggested that many in-flight wireless networks could expose the plane to being hacked or remotely controlled . In fact it’s of such a concern to US authorities that when a well-known computer security expert made an admittedly ill-thought-out joke about doing so on Twitter, he was promptly arrested, his computers confiscated, and subsequently banned from the airline . And all he was suggesting was to make the oxygen masks drop down. So it would appear that the stuff of Hollywood may jump from fiction to fact: Liam Neeson and Julianne Moore starred in the 2014 film Non-Stop , where a passenger hacking the aircraft’s internal wirel...
By Andrew Smith , The Open University According to the Liverpool Echo , UK government computers have been used to make offensive comments on the Wikipedia page detailing the 1989 Hillsbourgh Disaster over a number of years. The newspaper reports that revisions to the page have been made from computers using the government’s secure intranet since 2009. They include insults to Liverpool fans and a comment suggesting that fans were responsible for the football ground disaster, in which 96 people died. This case highlights the continual issue of trolling and cybervandalism on Wikipedia. It also shows how journalism is using good, technical forensic tools at the disposal of every cybercitizen. Cybercitizens can be good or bad So many of us use Wikipedia on a daily basis that it is one of the most visited websites in the world. Yet not that many of us really understand how it works. Wikipedia is based on the principle that the community can create, edit and refine pages covering...
Looking back, 2014 was not a good year for keeping things safe under digital lock and key. If a score was being kept, it might seem that the cybercriminals are in the lead, despite the valiant efforts – and own goals – from the cybersecurity profession worldwide. Cast your mind back to March , everyone was panicking about the HeartBleed bug. Based on an error in code upon which the majority of the world’s secure servers relied, experts had plenty of time to fix the issue. Sadly there was an array of conflicting information about changing passwords, leading to widespread confusion. While most IT administrators made sure this was managed in a professional manner, it created a stir that seemed to set the tone for the year. In May , online auction giant Ebay admitted to having been compromised. The site said its systems, with personal details of tens of millions of users, may have had been vulnerable for months. Everyone was advised, indeed forced, to change their password. In the...
Comments
Post a Comment