With somewhere in the region of 1.3 billion users, Facebook is the largest ever internet social engagement phenomenon. With so many people interconnected through the site, information can speedily propagate around the world – without any clear indication whether it is correct – and this has given new life to the phenomenon of the internet hoax.
Once hoaxes arrived as urgent steps to carry out to remove viruses that didn’t exist from your computer, or warnings about waking up in a bath of ice with no kidneys. On Facebook, one of the most frequently repeated is of the supposed power of making a declaration of rights over the user’s own content to prevent Facebook from using it for financial gain. For the record, declaring that under various (non existent) conventions that Facebook has no right to use your data is wholly meaningless.
Here we have the dilemma of using a service provided for free by Facebook, yet we are all keen to protect our privacy. Facebook, a commercial organisation, makes its money from mining our data to offer ever more accurate advertising. Our data is the company’s bread and butter, and it can easily manipulate our feeds to make sure that we see something that of interest.
Of course the company sets valid and, in its view, reasonable terms and conditions – if users don’t like it, they can easily leave. But of course hundreds of millions of people enjoy Facebook, like it (pun intended) for its social aspect, for being able to communicate with friends, family and find like-minded others. Many community organisations, charities and even companies rely heavily on the power of their Facebook presence to reach wider audiences. Yet the hoaxers know that we all react strongly to the word “privacy”.
So, back to privacy. Will you fall for this hoax or any others? Those researching the phenomenon have established that we are likely to fall for one, at some point. The reality is, if a friend who is someone you trust posts something the tendency is to believe it, and be willing to share it with others.
If it seems plausible and relates to something you care about, the chances are you will consider re-posting. This is no different to telling others about something you have discovered. I do not know how many times I have seen articles on the untimely death of Macaulay Culkin (which are not true).
Perhaps you’ve not thought this through.knowyourmeme
This is not new, and there have been many famous historical hoaxes, especially those involving the then new techniques of radio or photography. Though a misunderstanding rather than a hoax, Orson Welles' rendition of HG Wells' War of the Worlds on radio was convincing to many in the 1930s. Think about it: the world’s political climate was tense, the radio news broadcast is a trusted social communication medium, you can forgive their confusion.
The risk with hoaxes on social media is that they can be used as click bait, encouraging victims to follow the link to a website which could compromise or infect their computer or device. Hoaxes purporting to represent apparently authentic campaigns for environmental causes, for or against government policy, or for human rights abroad, can acquire an email and password and use them for malicious intent.
So while some hoaxes are simply childish entertainment, others do have a cynical side. If you are ever unsure, no matter how well you know whichever friend posted it to Facebook, websites such as Hoax Slayer or Snopes are well-informed and filled with information debunking or explaining the origins of almost every dubious internet claim.
If you discover your friend is sharing a hoax, be a great friend and show them the error of their ways, as the chances are it is spreading through Facebook to thousands of other contacts even as you read it.
This article was originally published on The Conversation.
Read the original article.
After reading a considered write up from colleague Ray Corrigan and support from Cory Doctorow I feel that here is one decision from our senior management, that for the first time in seven years made me wonder about the state of mind within the Open University (OU). One of the primary reasons I joined the OU is that it was a organisation I could get behind - irrespective of its many eccentricities. It's mission to enable whomever that tried; to reach for higher education - this was something I could easily get behind. We do need to look at how we use the different offices - but to cull them in such a manner and looking at the outcomes of the location analysis. Strikes me that whomever was given the job - did little to review each location and approached this from a purely numerical perspective. Having worked hard to develop a community of Cisco Academies, Vendor interests and interventions in the Computing and Network Engineering teaching communities. I have used thes...
Ok, this is not a scientific study, the audience participation is likely to be from a self selecting group etc. So lets call this a poll amongst friends, followers and like minded. A question that is structural to my research is ... Do you think simulation can replace real hardware, when teaching networking? To remain fair, I am not going to share my opinion as it is biased and please don't try and answer this to please me (as I really don't know who will be answering and if you know me, you will know that it won't). Please take a look at the top left of this blog and based on your personal opinion, answer either yes or no. You do not have to be an expert, or an academic or even a teccie, everyone's opinion in this context counts. The opinions below are valid view points, but must not contribute to your own independent decision, please complete the question before reading these. =================================...
The wheels at my university are renowned for being slow and cumbersome. However, getting a simple prepackaged course from a 3rd party with no rights issues out there has been nothing short of escargot'esqe. As of the 1st of May 2017 - we have our first Linux NAL - following the model of the relevant knowledge courses that once occupied the students of the Open University. Offering Linux is not a new notion - having offered for three years a short course in Linux that was at the time ahead of most in reaching a distance learning population. In this short time, we engaged with over 2400 students giving them all a taste of Linux. Now, with the maturity of HTML5 and some considerable insight from NDG and LPI in collaboration with Cisco Systems. We are able to offer a fully remote Linux experience. With the Linux operating system running as a web browser based cloud instance. Our first presentation of this course will have all the hallmarks of a discovery experience - while ...
Comments
Post a Comment