Terrorist Outrage >> Media Reaction >> CyberSecurity Knee Jerk ...


As soon as any network security, cyber security or technology expert writes in the wake of any atrocity there is a temptation to overstate a view in the hope that your opinion may be the fact that turns out to be true.

A week later, it may appear that the terrorists may have been more low tech than anticipated - which does beg other questions about surveillance. However this is not the point I wish to raise.

It is too easy to write an opinion article and join in the media reaction to what is clearly a major tragedy. Even media analysts admit that the western bias of many news organs miss out on the fact that there are other attacks taking place around the world, especially in the middle east. There is no single source, this is a multi-faceted issue, with multiple individuals, each with their own ideologies and capabilities.

While surveillance is an interesting tool and via open media channels information can be harvested - the sheer volume of data encrypted and unencrypted does not mean that a single terrorist communication can be discovered. It would be great to have the computing capacity - but the reality relies on detective work, informed intelligence from other sources and a directed approach towards individuals that may be considered interesting by the intelligence services.

Even then, lets assume that they are using an encrypted means of communication - which has a back door exposed to our security services. They need to understand if any messages sent have any meaning.

My Son (now 23) educated me around eight years ago in how a subversive cell could undermine the watchful eye of state censored technology. Okay it wasn't that interesting, he was 15 and like many children in the UK, used a school network that would flag any inappropriate communication and web sites. So naughty sweary words would be flagged and network technicians would take pleasure barring this puberty ridden clan.

Willing to rebel against this oppressive regime (in their opinion) - his mates all contrived a newspeak of their own making. Transliterating and misspelling many interesting naughty words. I will leave the lingo to your imagination - it wasn't refined and you may guess what the meaning of mayonnaise is.

I was more impressed than appalled - admiring the ingenuity of these young minds.

If someone or a group of souls are looking to subvert national security and communicate illicitly across a monitored system. Unless there is clear professional trade craft combined with cyber security skills - mass surveillance is going to do diddly. Large volumes of data may be harvested - every website we visit may be logged for one year - but if I agree a communication convention that is innocuous and in plain sight. Then what good will that do.

Dear Media, do shush, dear cyber security experts and politicians, do shush as well - let us be more tactical and rely on some considerably old fashioned means of analysis.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia editors never walk alone: Hillsborough changes can be traced ... from @ConversationUK

Image
By Andrew Smith , The Open University According to the Liverpool Echo , UK government computers have been used to make offensive comments on the Wikipedia page detailing the 1989 Hillsbourgh Disaster over a number of years. The newspaper reports that revisions to the page have been made from computers using the government’s secure intranet since 2009. They include insults to Liverpool fans and a comment suggesting that fans were responsible for the football ground disaster, in which 96 people died. This case highlights the continual issue of trolling and cybervandalism on Wikipedia. It also shows how journalism is using good, technical forensic tools at the disposal of every cybercitizen. Cybercitizens can be good or bad So many of us use Wikipedia on a daily basis that it is one of the most visited websites in the world. Yet not that many of us really understand how it works. Wikipedia is based on the principle that the community can create, edit and refine pages covering
Read more

If airlines offer in-flight Wi-Fi, they should invest in an extra black box for security ...

Image
Yijun Yu , The Open University and Andrew Smith , The Open University In-flight Wi-Fi is one of the most sought-after facilities for air travellers these days, now that laptops and smartphones are so common and so much of our working and personal life revolves around online services. But a US Government Accountability Office report has suggested that many in-flight wireless networks could expose the plane to being hacked or remotely controlled . In fact it’s of such a concern to US authorities that when a well-known computer security expert made an admittedly ill-thought-out joke about doing so on Twitter, he was promptly arrested, his computers confiscated, and subsequently banned from the airline . And all he was suggesting was to make the oxygen masks drop down. So it would appear that the stuff of Hollywood may jump from fiction to fact: Liam Neeson and Julianne Moore starred in the 2014 film Non-Stop , where a passenger hacking the aircraft’s internal wirel
Read more

Highlights and lowlights of 2014, a golden year for cybercrime from @ConversationUK

Image
Looking back, 2014 was not a good year for keeping things safe under digital lock and key. If a score was being kept, it might seem that the cybercriminals are in the lead, despite the valiant efforts – and own goals – from the cybersecurity profession worldwide. Cast your mind back to March , everyone was panicking about the HeartBleed bug. Based on an error in code upon which the majority of the world’s secure servers relied, experts had plenty of time to fix the issue. Sadly there was an array of conflicting information about changing passwords, leading to widespread confusion. While most IT administrators made sure this was managed in a professional manner, it created a stir that seemed to set the tone for the year. In May , online auction giant Ebay admitted to having been compromised. The site said its systems, with personal details of tens of millions of users, may have had been vulnerable for months. Everyone was advised, indeed forced, to change their password. In the
Read more